Johnny Shines w/Big Walter Horton VG++ LP Testament
$
30
Favourite Auctions
To save auctions to your favourites, please login
If you don't have an account, please register
Description
Johnny Shines with Big Walter Horton
Testament T-2217
These are live performance recordings from1966 and 1969 and I’m sure this is a re-issue, but it does not say when this copy was made.
These are great recordings of Johnny Shines on vocals and guitar, Big Walter Horton on harmonica, Otis Spann on piano, Lee Jackson on bass and Fred Below on drums for half the tracks and then joined by Luther Allison for half the tracks with a different bass and drummer. Big Walter Horton does sing on one track. There is some amazing harmonica work on this record along with the always impressive guitar work of Johnny Shines and Luther Allison.
Record VG++ With the exception of some very, very light sleeve marks, the vinyl looks like new. Any minimal surface noise that can be heard would not take away from the music at all.
Cover VG++ The cover pretty much looks like new except for some light bends around the edges in a couple of places.
I've kept all of my records in plastic sleeves to protect the covers and have a smoke-free home.
I have many Blues, Jazz, World, Bluegrass, Folk, Gospel, Rock, New Age, Spoken Word and other genre's that I will be listing in the near future from my collection that I have put together over the past 30 years.
My grading of the condition is based on Goldmine's system and I have been selective as to the quality of the records I've purchased.
I will be conservative in my assessment of condition and will try to be thorough in explaining and illustrating any defects or condition issues in my listings.
Shipping charges are: U.S. Postal Service Media Mail $4.00, anywhere in the U.S.
U.S. Postal Service Priority Mail $10.50 anywhere in the U.S.
This includes delivery confirmation and shipping/handling costs.
Additional records will cost $1.00 each if shipped in the same box.
All records will be well packaged in quality custom record boxes with new cardboard pads and new bubble wrap for extra protection.
I am only accepting payment through PayPal at this time
I will accept returns up to 7 days with the buyer paying for return shipping.
If there are any problems, please contact me before returning an item or before leaving feedback so that we can try to resolve the situation first.
Feedback would be greatly appreciated and I will also leave feedback for you.
If you have any questions about this record, please contact me. Thank you for your interest!
My Vinyl Grading System Based on Goldmine’s Standards
Although I grade my records visually, I will attempt, as much as I can to also let the buyer know if the recording was from a less than quality source. I make no guarantees of this, but I will try, for example to mention if a 33 1/3 RPM record was recorded from older 1930’s 78 RPM discs, and even though the vinyl looks like new, it sounds like it is very scratchy with lots of surface noise. Also, some live recordings are really lacking in sound quality and I will try to mention this also. I want you to be happy with your purchase and to know as much as possible about what you are bidding on.
I keep my records and stylus clean, replace the stylus when it gets worn and only handle my records by the edges, which also means not ever touching the trail-in vinyl.
M (Mint) I don’t use this description in my listings. I feel that the only records that should be called Mint are SS (Still Sealed) records, in which case I will call them SS.
NM (Near Mint) I reserve this description for records that I personally purchased new and after opening, only played them once or twice and they still look new.
NM- (Near Mint Minus) These are records that are in nearly perfect condition with the exception of a light sleeve scuff, which doesn’t affect sound quality.
VG++ (Very Good Plus Plus) I use this to describe a record that was very well taken care of, has no noticeable condition issues aside from a few sleeve scuffs or very light surface scratches that didn’t affect sound quality.
VG+ (Very Good Plus) This would describe a record which had still been taken good care of, but which may have some light audible surface noise (most commonly on the first track of either side) or an occasional pop, but nothing that takes away from the listening experience. The record will still have most of its original luster and have only minimal light surface scratches if held to a bright light.
VG (Very Good) A record that has seen a fair amount of play and therefor has lost some of its original luster and has noticeable surface noise, or a record that overall looks great, but has issues like scratches that can be clearly seen and heard on parts of the record. I don’t sell records with warps or scratches that cause any skipping.
VG- (Very Good Minus) This would be a record that has a lot of wear and has enough scratches or overly worn grooves to hear very noticeable noise throughout the music. Still a playable and enjoyable record to listen to though. No skips at all and no noise that completely overwhelms the music.
G (Good) Not Good! I don’t have many records that I would list for sale that are in this condition. It would be a record that is basically trashed (but still doesn’t skip) and probably has lots of scuffs, scratches and/or a record which has lost most of its surface luster. There are some records though, that due to their rarity, someone might want a copy in this condition, as opposed to no copy of it at all. This is a record that could still be played and the music could still be listened to if one could tune out the noise and pops that were competing with the music.
Record Covers – Along with grading, I will try to describe and photograph any major defects of covers such as bent corners, water stains, split seams and ringwear. I have always kept all my records in plastic sleeves to protect them, have never smoked and have kept them vertical in record bins which I built and keep in the house.
Final thought on vinyl quality: Many older records which were pressed in the 50’s for example, have deeper grooves and therefore can sound much better than they look, since surface scratches often do not go deep enough to affect where the stylus is riding in the groove of those records. Also, in turn, many records that were pressed in the 80’s were made with inferior vinyl and have shallow grooves that didn’t even sound clean when they were brand new. Of course this is a bit of a generalization, because there were still some poor quality pressings in the 50’s and some good quality pressings more recently. That said, the label name of a record is also equally important to keep in mind. For example, older Verve records from the 50’s and 60’s are usually very quality pressings compared to a label like Crown from the 60’s which were often not of very good quality.
I hope this helps, but if you have any specific questions of the quality or condition of any of my records, please feel free to ask.
price rating