PUBLIC IMAGE LTD ALIFE 2009 PART 2 PIL 2 x 12" RED VINYL RECORD ALBUM RSD 2015
  £   25
  $   33

 


£ 25 Sold For
Oct 22, 2025 Sold Date
Mar 8, 2025 Start Date
1 Number Of Bids
  Great Britain Country Of Seller
eBay Sold at
 
save auction  

Description

PUBLIC IMAGE LTD
ALIFE 2009 PART 2
RECORD STORE DAY 2015 RELEASE
2 x 12" HEAVYWEIGHT RED VINYL RECORD ALBUM SET

ONE OF A LIMITED EDITION OF 1000 COPIES WORLDWIDE
WHITE VINYL
NEW AND UNPLAYED
LET THEM EAT VINYL RECORDS
BARCODE: SEE ABOVE
LETV349LP2015
NEW/UNPLAYED
THE RECORD WILL BE POSTED IN A PROTECTIVE PVC COVER IN A DEDICATED RECORD MAILER FOR SAFE TRANSIT
THE PICTURES SHOWN IN THE LISTING ARE OF THE ACTUAL ITEM FOR SALE
I DO NOT USE MISLEADING STOCK PHOTOS
INFORMATION BELOW KINDLY PROVIDED BY DISCOGS
FAST UK ROYAL MAIL 48 HOUR TRACKED POSTAGE
THANKS FOR LOOKING
ALiFE 2009 Part 2
Label:Let Them Eat Vinyl – LETV349LP, Concert Live – LETV349LP
Format:2 x Vinyl, LP, Album, Record Store Day, Limited Edition, RedCountry:UK
Released:18 Apr 2015
Genre:Rock
Style:Alternative Rock
TracklistA1PsychopathA2DisappointedA3WarriorB4USLS 1B5BagsB6ChantC7MemoriesC8AnnalisaC9ReligionD10SunD11RiseD12Open UpCompanies, etc.Manufactured By – Plastic HeadDistributed By – Plastic HeadPhonographic Copyright ℗ – Concert LiveCopyright © – Let Them Eat VinylLicensed From – Concert LiveLacquer Cut At – The Vinyl RoomPressed By – MPORecorded At – Brixton AcademyCreditsArtwork – John Rambo StevensEngineer [Live Sound] – Walter JaquissLacquer Cut By – LvC*Layout – Francesca DicembrePerformer – Bruce Smith, Lu Edmonds, Scott FirthPerformer, Artwork – John LydonRecorded By, Mixed By – Andrew Tulloch
Notes
Record Store Day, 2015 Release. Part two of the concert from 2009. Edition of 1,000 copies.

Transparent red vinyl. Gatefold sleeve.
Company inner sleeves showing other LTEV releases.
Package came shrink-wrapped affixed to which is a colour co-ordinating hype sticker.

Tracks are numbered sequentially across the release 1 to 12.
Runouts are etched.Barcode and Other IdentifiersPressing Plant ID: Triple concentric ringsMatrix / Runout (Side A runout): LETV349LP -A- -LvC- MPOMatrix / Runout (Side B runout): LETV349LP -B- -LvC- MPOMatrix / Runout (Side C runout): LETV349LP -C- -LvC- MPOMatrix / Runout (Side D runout): LETV349LP -D- -LvC- MPOOther Versions (5 of 12)View All


GRADING GUIDE
Here are the standard grades for record albums, from best to worst.
MINT (M)
These are absolutely perfect in every way. Often rumored but rarely seen, Mint should never be used as a grade unless more than one person agrees that the record or sleeve truly is in this condition. There is no set percentage of the Near Mint value these can bring; it is best negotiated between buyer and seller.
NEAR MINT (NM OR M-)
A good description of a NM record is “it looks like it just came from a retail store and it was opened for the first time.” In other words, it’s nearly perfect. Many dealers won’t use a grade higher than this, implying (perhaps correctly) that no record or sleeve is ever truly perfect.NM records are shiny, with no visible defects. Writing, stickers or other markings cannot appear on the label, nor can any “spindle marks” from someone trying to blindly put the record on the turntable. Major factory defects also must be absent; a record and label obviously pressed off center is not Near Mint. If played, it will do so with no surface noise. (NM records don’t have to be “never played”; a record used on an excellent turntable can remain NM after many plays if the disc is properly cared for.)NM covers are free of creases, ring wear and seam splits of any kind.NOTE: These are high standards, and they are not on a sliding scale. A record or sleeve from the 1950s must meet the same standards as one from the 1990s or 2000s to be Near Mint! It’s estimated that no more than 2 to 4 percent of all records remaining from the 1950s and 1960s are truly Near Mint. This is why they fetch such high prices, even for more common items.Don’t assume your records are Near Mint. They must meet these standards to qualify!
VERY GOOD PLUS (VG+) or EXCELLENT (E)
A good description of a VG+ record is “except for a couple minor things, this would be Near Mint.” Most collectors, especially those who want to play their records, will be happy with a VG+ record, especially if it toward the high end of the grade (sometimes called VG++ or E+).VG+ records may show some slight signs of wear, including light scuffs or very light scratches that do not affect the listening experience. Slight warps that do not affect the sound are OK. Minor signs of handling are OK, too, such as telltale marks around the center hole, but repeated playing has not misshapen the hole. There may be some very light ring wear or discoloration, but it should be barely noticeable.VG+ covers should have only minor wear. A VG+ cover might have some very minor seam wear or a split (less than one inch long) at the bottom, the most vulnerable location. Also, a VG+ cover may have some defacing, such as a cut-out marking. Covers with cut-out markings can never be considered Near Mint.
Very Good (VG)
Many of the imperfections found on a VG+ record are more obvious on a VG record. That said, VG records — which usually sell for no more than 25 percent of a NM record — are among the biggest bargains in record collecting, because most of the “big money” goes for more perfect copies. For many listeners, a VG record or sleeve will be worth the money.VG records have more obvious flaws than their counterparts in better shape. They lack most of the original gloss found on factory-fresh records. Groove wear is evident on sight, as are light scratches deep enough to feel with a fingernail. When played, a VG record has surface noise, and some scratches may be audible, especially in soft passages and during a song’s intro and ending. But the noise will not overpower the music otherwise.Minor writing, tape or a sticker can detract from the label. Many collectors who have jukeboxes will use VG records in them and not think twice. They remain a fine listening experience, just not the same as if it were in better shape.VG covers will have many signs of human handling. Ring wear in the middle or along the edges of the cover where the edge of a record would reside, is obvious, though not overwhelming. Some more creases might be visible. Seam splitting will be more obvious; it may appear on all three sides, though it won’t be obvious upon looking. Someone might have written or it or stamped a price tag on it, too.
Good (G),Good Plus (G+) or Very Good Minus (VG–)
These records go for 10 to 15 percent of the Near Mint value, if you are lucky.Good does not mean bad! The record still plays through without skipping, so it can serve as filler until something better comes along. But it has significant surface noise and groove wear, and the label is worn, with significant ring wear, heavy writing, or obvious damage caused by someone trying to remove tape or stickers and failing miserably. A Good to VG– cover has ring wear to the point of distraction, has seam splits obvious on sight and may have even heavier writing, such as, for example, huge radio station letters written across the front to deter theft.If the item is common, it’s probably better to pass it up. But if you’ve been seeking it for a long time, get it cheap and look to upgrade.
POOR (P) and Fair (F)
Poor (P) and Fair (F) records go for 0 to 5 percent of the Near Mint value, if they go at all. More likely, they end up going in the trash. Records are cracked, impossibly warped, or skip and/or repeat when an attempt is made to play them. Covers are so heavily damaged that you almost want to cry.

 


price rating